Why Your AI-Generated Songs Won't Make Money in 2025

Last updated: February 25, 2025

The End of AI Music Gold Rush: Copyright Office Makes Historic Decision

In a groundbreaking decision that will reshape the future of AI in creative industries, the U.S. Copyright Office has officially ruled that works produced entirely by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted. This January 2025 ruling definitively answers the question that's been on everyone's mind since generative AI exploded onto the scene: Who really owns AI-generated content?

The answer: No one can.

This decision creates a clear distinction between using AI as a tool versus letting AI do all the creative work. For musicians, producers, and platforms built around AI music generation, the implications are enormous.

Breaking Down the 2025 Copyright Framework for AI Music

The U.S. Copyright Office's January 29, 2025 report establishes three key scenarios for works involving AI:

1. Using AI as an assistive tool rather than replacing human creativity
2. Incorporating human-created elements into AI-generated output
3. Creatively arranging or modifying AI-generated elements

The report explicitly states that a work produced entirely through AI text prompts—regardless of how detailed those prompts are—cannot be copyrighted. Why? Because the same prompt can generate wildly different results each time, demonstrating that users lack meaningful control over the AI's internal processes.

"Copyright law has long adapted to new technology and can enable case-by-case determinations as to whether AI-generated outputs reflect sufficient human contribution to warrant copyright protection." - U.S. Copyright Office Report, January 2025

GEMA vs. Suno: The European Legal Battle Over AI Music Training

Adding to the legal challenges, on January 21, 2025, GEMA (Germany's largest authors' rights society) filed a lawsuit against Suno Inc. at the Munich Regional Court. GEMA accuses Suno of training its AI models on copyrighted songs without proper licensing or compensating rights holders.

The lawsuit highlights specific examples where Suno's AI-generated outputs closely resemble iconic songs like Forever Young by Alphaville and Mambo No. 5 by Lou Bega in melody, harmony, and rhythm. GEMA argues that Suno profits from subscription fees while neglecting to compensate original creators—a practice they consider a violation of copyright law.

Uncopyrigthable Music: What Falls Outside Protection in 2025

Based on the new ruling, these types of works won't receive copyright protection:

• Songs created entirely through AI platforms using only text prompts
• Music generated automatically by AI without significant human modification
• Compositions where human input is limited to selecting from AI-generated options

For platforms like Suno, which was recently endorsed by producer Timbaland, this ruling poses substantial challenges to their business model. The message is clear: You can create AI-generated music, but it will have no copyright protection and limited commercial value.

Human Creativity Still Wins: What Music Can Retain Copyright Protection

The news isn't all bad. The Copyright Office clarifies that when AI is used as a tool to augment human creativity—rather than replace it—the resulting work can still qualify for copyright protection.

Copyright-eligible scenarios include:

• Starting with an AI-generated melody or chord progression, then adding your own lyrics, instrumentation, and production elements
• Using AI to suggest arrangement ideas that you then significantly edit, expand upon, and integrate into a larger composition
• Incorporating AI-generated segments into a primarily human-created work

The key factor is your creative contribution and control over the final product. If your creative input is perceptible in the output, those portions may be eligible for copyright protection.

The Pollock Principle: How Authorities Determine Human Creativity

To illustrate its stance, the Copyright Office uses an interesting analogy: Jackson Pollock's seemingly random paintings remain copyrightable because Pollock made tangible and deliberate creative decisions—choosing colors, determining layers, and controlling the physical execution of the work.

By contrast, simply prompting an AI and accepting its output involves an algorithmic process largely outside the user's direct control. The distinction isn't about predictability but about human creative involvement.

From McCartney to Metallica: Why Music Legends Fear AI Dominance

High-profile musicians including Paul McCartney and Elton John have voiced concerns about AI's potential impact on artist revenues. Their worry is that if AI-generated content floods the market without restriction, it could:

• Devalue human creativity
• Make original works indistinguishable from AI clones
• Ultimately make the role of genuine creators unnecessary
• Significantly reduce income opportunities for real musicians

While the ruling doesn't prevent anyone from using AI creatively, it establishes that purely AI-generated works remain in the public domain—removing the financial incentive to mass-produce AI content without human input.

Streaming Economics: How Spotify and YouTube Might Change AI Music Payments

Industry experts predict that streaming services like Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube will likely modify royalty payouts for AI-generated music, potentially giving them a status similar to cover songs. This would fundamentally change the economics of AI music platforms.

For producers and musicians, this means:

1. Learning to use AI as a collaborative tool rather than a replacement
2. Documenting your creative process meticulously
3. Ensuring significant human contribution in all work you intend to copyright
4. Preparing for new streaming service policies regarding AI-generated content

Global Copyright Consensus: Beyond American Borders

The U.S. is not alone in this position. Korea, Japan, and European Union member states have similarly affirmed that meaningful human creative contribution is necessary for copyright protection. This emerging global consensus provides creators with more certainty as they navigate international markets.

The Horizon: Emerging Legal Questions for AI Music Creation

The Copyright Office believes existing legal frameworks are flexible enough to address emerging AI-related copyright issues. However, they acknowledge that technology continues to evolve rapidly. Future AI tools that offer users greater direct control over the creative process might warrant reconsideration of these guidelines.

Additionally, the Copyright Office will soon address other complex issues at the intersection of AI and copyright, including:

• Training of AI models on copyrighted works
• Licensing considerations
• Fair use applications
• Liability allocation

The Producer's Playbook: Navigating AI Music in 2025 and Beyond

The message is clear: You can—and should—use AI as a collaborative tool in your creative process. Having AI generate ideas that you then develop, modify, and integrate with your own creative elements can result in copyrightable work.

What you can't do is generate a complete song through AI prompts alone and expect to own or monetize it. The human touch remains essential not just for copyright purposes, but for the soul of music itself.

As one industry producer notes: "The good news is, generating music from Suno and pushing it up to YouTube is soon not going to be an option for monetization. If people want to monetize their AI content, they'll have to either reproduce it themselves or have a producer do it for them."

Key Takeaways for Musicians in the AI Era

• AI-generated works without significant human contribution cannot be copyrighted
• Using AI as a tool to enhance human creativity can still result in copyrightable work
• Document your creative process thoroughly when using AI
• Streaming services will likely adjust royalty structures for AI music
• The global legal consensus is forming around these principles

How are you incorporating AI into your creative process while maintaining your human touch? Share your experiences in the comments below.

Want to stay updated on the latest developments in AI music and copyright? Subscribe to our newsletter for weekly insights.